![]() ![]() Also, there are a lot of files for each collection of reducers. Like all things, it has pros and cons too.Īs with the pros, redux gained fame for being one of the best state management libraries, but lately, it was very difficult to maintain because of the boilerplate as we have to write all the reducers, action constants, action creators, and the store. Later, this problem is solved by redux-thunk which checks, executes any async functions, and returns a plain object from that response. We will never always return an object from the reducers and it will never perform asynchronous tasks. The Reducer Will Always be Pure Functions And Must Not Have Any Side Effects.We will never have more than one global store. That means we can't use functions like array.push(). Instead, we can take snapshots and manipulate that. We will never mutate the state, no matter what our needs are. That means no unintentional re-rendering of the components and no prop drilling to child components.Ĭentralizing your application's state and logic enables powerful capabilities like undo/redo, state persistence, and much more.Ĭhange the state of the application from any of the child components no matter how deep they are nested.īut for gaining so much power, we need to take some precautions. Redux helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. It mainly gained its fame for particularly two things: For the past few years, people and companies are considering Redux as their first and foremost priority library for managing states inside of a web application. Redux is a state management for different libraries like Vue, Angular, React and even vanilla JavaScript, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |